Registered Sex Offender Says He Is a Transient in San Diego, But Has a 2 Bedroom Apartment
Medical Marijuana - War on Peace
FRAUD ALERT | The over 1 billion dollar fraud - Pacific Law Center
DUI - MARIJUANA
Do not trust KGTV Channel 10News San Diego
Pacific Law Center Sucks
Visit 100FreeAttorneys.com
Mr. JEFFREY L. PHILLIPS
I hired Pacific Law Center on August 31, 2006 for a criminal case while I was in a San Diego jail. For over a week they did nothing but take money, so I called Pacific Law Center on September 8, 2006 and fired Pacific Law Center.
On September 11, 2006 which was after I had fired Pacific Law Center, they came to jail to speak with me, and obviously I had refused to see the attorney.
On my next court date which was September 18, 2006 unknown to the court that I had fired Pacific Law Center, Pacific Law Center went to court and waved my rights to appear in court and kept themselves on record as my attorneys. Preosecutors were present in court.
On September 19, 2006 I did a cash bail out of jail, and I started to investigate Pacific Law Center.
I discovered that the owner of Pacific Law Center is a Mr.Jeffrey Phillips, and that he also owns a law firm in Phoenix, Arizona by the name of Phillips & Associates Law Firm.
I had found out that Pacific Law Center is a professional corporation in the State of California and it is listed with the Secretary of State of California as of January 14, 2003.
When Mr. Jeffrey Phillips filed with the Secretary of State of California on January 14, 2003 which was four months after he was found guilty on 20 complaints at the Arizona Supreme Court on September 13, 2002 related to his law firm, he listed himself as the agent to contact, with an address of 4025 Bayard Street, San Diego CA 92109, which means that he is a licensed California attorney and listed with The State Bar of California..
What Mr. Jeffrey Phillips did was he purchased a house in San Diego, California just so he can provide an San Diego address to the Secretary of State of California. Mr. Jeffrey Phillips never did live at this house, he lives in the State of Arizona.
I checked with The State Bar of California and found out that Mr. Jeffrey Phillips is not a licensed California attorney and Mr. Jeffrey Phillips is not listed with The State Bar of California.
I checked to see if other attorney's listed on their website pacificlawcenter.com are licensed California attorneys and I discovered that there are more employees listed with Pacific Law Center as attorney's and they are not licensed California attorney's and are not listed with The State Bar of California, which one of them is a Mr.John A. Schill.
Pacific Law Center started as a fraud, and still is a fraud due to the fact that evidence shows of coverups. For every single letter that Pacific Law Center has or does mail out through the United States Postal Service asking and or demanding payment it is a Federal Crime called Mail Fraud, and for every single phone call that Pacific Law Center has made or makes asking and or demanding payment it is a Federal Crime called Wire Fraud.
Pacific Law Center and their conspirators filed multiple lawsuits against me in order to keep me silent, and the government agreed from City, County, State and Federal.
Well over 100,000 people from San Diego County have hired Pacific Law Center for criminal cases. My focus is mostly on the criminal cases that Pacific Law Center was and is involved in. 100,000 people is a low ball figure.
Pacific Law Center charged me $9000 and it was not a felony case.
There are several customers that have paid Pacific Law Center well over $150,000 for their criminal case.
So lets assume that Pacific Law Center charged $10,000 per customer of 100,000 criminal cases, that would add up to $1,000,000,000 (One Billion dollars), and this is the absolute low ball numbers. It is the same thing that Mr. Jeffrey Phillips is doing in the State of Arizona.
Every single customer of Pacific Law Center since January 14, 2003 is entitled to a full refund and to have their criminal cases reviewed and more than likely have their cases overturned and thrown out. This is one of the many main reasons that the government (District Attorney) does not want to recognize this ongoing fraud, because they will have to go through over 100,000 criminal cases and it will cost the government hundreds of millions of dollars. Pacific Law Center has already started to destroy thier customers files from 2003 and 2004.
The media is well aware of this ongoing fraud, but because they get paid millions of dollars for advertisements from Pacific Law Center they have not only chosen to stay silent, but to help Pacific Law Center to keep me silent, which includes misleading the public through their reportings. 10news.com did nothing, including other local media stations. They all want a piece of the billion dollar scam.
On July 10, 2007 just two days before I was placed in federal jail for writing about this fraud, I recieved an e-mail from 10news.com, and they 10news.com called me two times on July 10, 2007 and left messages to give me the impresion that the media will expose the Pacific Law Center fraud.
I had contacted 10 News San Diego I-Team and 10News Marti Emerald “Troubleshooter” on April 3, 2007 about this fraud, but ABC 10 News San Diego which is partners with CNN decided to conspire with Pacific Law Center to keep me silent.
But they were not the only ones with the US Federal Court willing to put me in prison for writing. On February 27, 2007 without me being in court let alone being served, employees of the California Superior Court and a Judge decided to keep me silent by issuing a court order the I can not write the words Pacific Law Center in any published communication.
On July 12, 2007 a U.S. Federal Judge Mr.Larry Alan Burns had me placed in a federal jail on behalf of Pacific Law Center.
On July 23, 2007 ACLU filed papers on my behalf in the U.S. Federal Court, and immediately on that same day Mr. Jeffrey Phillips took his name off of the agent to contact filed with the Secretary of State of California. He placed the name of a Mr. Alan Spears as the agent of contact, and himself as the CEO. See documents below.
Picture below taken from 10news.com website: The guy on top is Mr. Jeffrey Phillips, and the guy in the second row to the right is Mr.John A. Schill whom is a main player in this ongoing fraud and coverup.
From 10news.com website.
Mr.Kerry Steigerwalt steped in to coverup this ongoing billion dollar fraud.
Freedom of Speech Email Tip
Shahrokjh Saadat-Nejad,
My name is Stacy Lee and I am a research Investigator for Channel 10 news Sam Diego. On April 3, 2007 we received a news tip regarding your rights being violated by the Pacific Law Center . I am emailing you to further develop this tip to see if we can make it into a story. Please let me know if the ACLU ever took care of this, or if they did not, and where your case is progressing towards now. Thank you! Have a good day.
Stacy Lee
Research Investigator
Channel 10 News San Diego
(619) 237-6378
______________________________________________________________
On July 10, 2007 I also recieved two messages from 10 News (Stacy Lee)
(619) 237-1010
3:45pm - 3:50pm
________________________________________________________
supreme.state.az.us — Go To Page 5
Mr. JEFFREY L. PHILLIPS READ WHAT 10 NEWS and KUSI NEWS
CEO and owner of two law firms listed below;
Kerry Steigerwalt's Pacific Law Center
4225 Executive Square
Suite #1500, 15th Floor
La Jolla CA 92037
Phillips and Associates Law Firm
3030 North 3rd Street
Suite 1100, Eleventh floor
Phoenix, ARIZONA 85012-3049
Mr. Kerry Steigerwalt is not the CEO or the owner of Pacific Law Center.
The name "Kerry Steigerwalt's Pacific Law Center" is to mislead the public and government investigators.
Arizona Bar No. 013362;
File Nos. 98-2204, 99-0389, 99-0455, 99-0571, 99-0610, 99-0983, 99-1208, 99-2151, 99-2084, 99-2233, 99-2291, 00-0005, 00-0024, 00-0041, 00-0045, 00-0098, 00-0110, 00-0348, 00-2560 and 01-0574.
By the Arizona Supreme Court Judgment and Order dated Sept. 13, 2002, owner of Phillips and Associates Law Firm, Mr. Jeffrey L. Phillips, 3030 N. 3rd Street, Suite 1100, Phoenix, AZ85012, was found guilty and was censured and placed on two years of intensive probation, including Law Office Management Assistance Program (LOMAP), by consent, for violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Mr. Phillips was also ordered to pay costs and expenses incurred by the StateBar in the amount of $12,710.38, together with interest at the legal rate.
Mr. Phillips failed to adequately supervise subordinate attorneys and non-lawyer specialists.
Specifically, intake personnel failed to affirmatively identify themselves as non-attorneys and failed to affirmatively offer or provide adequate information concerning limitationson the applicability of Mr. Phillips’ firm’sadvertised “little or no money down” payment plans.
The Disciplinary Commission found two aggravating factors pursuant to the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions, Section 9.22: (c) pattern of misconduct and (d) multiple offenses.
The Disciplinary Commission found five mitigating factors pursuant to Section 9.32 of the ABA Standards: (a) absence of prior disciplinary history, (b) absence of selfish or dishonest motive, (d) timely good faith effort to make restitution orto rectify consequences of misconduct, (e) fulland free disclosure to disciplinary board orcooperative attitude towards proceedings and (l) remorse.
Mr. Phillips’ conduct violated Rule 42,ARIZ.R.S.CT., specifically ERs 5.1, 5.3 and7.1.
WILL NEVER TELL YOU ABOUT
KERRY STEIGERWALT'S BUSINESS PARTNERS
and
supreme.state.az.us — Go To Page 5
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Suspension of Attorney
But it will review case of 2nd attorney at Phillips & Associates
May 21, 2010
azcentral.com
The Arizona Supreme Court on Thursday let stand a suspension of one prominent attorney at Phoenix law firm Phillips & Associates but agreed to review the proposed suspension of another attorney at the firm.
The state high court wouldn't review an appeal by attorney Robert Arentz, meaning his 60-day suspension will stand. But it agreed to hear arguments on whether a longer suspension of Jeffrey Phillips, for six months and a day, is appropriate.
If upheld, Phillips would have to reapply for his license from the Arizona State Bar. Meanwhile, his case likely will linger for at least a couple of months.
The actions stem from what Arizona State Bar officials called the firm's "detrimental" dealings with clients and potential clients.
The state Bar investigated 22 complaints against the firm from 2004 to 2007, largely focused on aggressive sales practices such as bonus payments to non-attorney employees who signed up clients. Investigators found nine ethical violations.
"Their focus was on getting people to sign on the dotted line and get as much money up front as possible," said Maret Vessella, chief Bar counsel.
Rather, she said, consumers should expect to meet with an attorney, have that person listen to their problems and receive a fair evaluation of their situation before deciding whether to hire the firm.
Phillips & Associates, which advertises heavily on local television, focuses largely on injury, bankruptcy, criminal and impaired-driving cases. Arentz and Phillips have appeared repeatedly as spokesmen for the firm.
The Supreme Court is the entity with authority to suspend attorneys for misconduct issues in Arizona. A disciplinary committee of the court recommended the suspensions, along with two years' probation for each attorney and restitution of nearly $14,000 to three clients.
Neither Arentz nor Phillips immediately returned a call requesting comment.
Prosecutors:
Pacific Law Center in San Diego, California which is owned by Phillips and Associates Law Firm in Arizona operates very much like a government office.
San Diego County Public Defenders Office is a government office. Every person that works for the San Diego County Public Defenders Office gets paid by a government check. We as tax payers pay for that office to operate, but we as tax payers do not have control of how much funding and support the San Diego Public Defenders Office gets. Compared to the funding and support that the San Diego County District Attorneys Office and the City of San Diego Attorneys Office it is insulting to the tax payer. Should the tax payer ever need to be represented by the San Diego County Public Defenders Office, that person will not get a fair defense due to lack of funding.
Pacific Law Center is private, and they spend over $10,000,000 a year on advertising, and Pacific Law Center has over 100 employees that get paid very well. If you look at the website of PacificLawCenter.com you will see that they only have 20 attorneys as of March 11, 2007 and some are supervisors that perhaps have even forgotten what a court room looks like. What do the other 80 employees do at Pacific Law Center? Pacific Law Center needs paralegals, investigators, a marketing department, janitors, delivery personals, limo drivers Etc…
It is a big overhead that Pacific Law Center has. Just like any business Pacific Law Center wants to save money. Operating Pacific Law Center like the San Diego County Public Defenders Office can save alot of money.
What does the San Diego County Public Defenders Office do so it can save money, while still representing the tax payer? Make deals with the prosecutor(s). It is always ONLY the prosecutors that offer the deals to the San Diego County Public Defenders Office and to any other defense attorney(s).
This is where corruption can be suggested. Why would a person hire Pacific Law Center when it can get the same results as if the accused was being represented by the San Diego County Public Defenders Office? Heavy marketing by Pacific Law Center is the reason. Misleading the public that they Pacific Law Center will get you better results from just about any other defense attorney in the State of California as a whole. This is called fraud.
The San Diego County District Attorneys Office has a fraud investigation unit which I know that they are very good at what they do, and I personally thank them for their efforts of protecting us regardless of race or gender.
The San Diego County District Attorneys Office has over 1,000 employees, and more than 250 of them are attorneys, and more than 100 of them are investigators. Because of better pay, and only because of better pay 14 investigators from the San Diego Police Department went to work for the San Diego District Attorneys Office.
San Diego County government as a whole is and has been having major problems with money due to frauds which we all see on the media. Where does the San Diego District Attorneys Office get the funds to hire 14 additional investigators when the San Diego Police Department has a difficult time with funds?
When a deal is made on a criminal matter it saves all parties money, except the defendant. If the defendant is being represented by Pacific Law Center then there is no refund on a retainer (contract). This is a major hustle that brings in alot of money, and this is called fraud.
So why wont the San Diego District Attorneys Office stop this hustle (fraud)? The motive is when Pacific Law Center talks its clients into taking just about all deals offered by the San Diego County District Attorneys Office ALL parties save money except the defendant.
If the defendant wants to take his/her criminal case to trial all parties turn their backs on the defendant, that includes Pacific Law Center and the San Diego County Public Defenders Office in a manner that is called being railroaded in jail or prison, and this is called fraud, and violations of so many things that is related to human rights violations.
Pacific Law Center PC,
and
Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith LLP,
vs.
Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad
Filing # 88
The small print on their 10 second KGTV channel 10 news San Diego commercials that you can never read: Bankruptcy & Debt Relief - Littleor $0 Down*
*$0 Down available if requested to begin preparation of a bankruptcy case. Filing & legal fees must be paid before filing.
We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
NOTE THE HUSTLE: "Filing & legal fees must be paid before filing" - Besides the filing fees, The legal fees are higher than the filing fees.
Notice it says "We are a debt relief agency." - It does not say We are a Law Firm.
Notice it says "We help people file...." - Their saying your an idiot.
All Accidents & Injury - No Fees Unless We Win Your Case*
* No attorney fees unless we win your case. Fees are a percentage of recovery before expenses are deducted. Client liable for expenses regardless of outcome.
NOTE THE HUSTLE: "Fees are a percentage of recovery before expenses are deducted. Client liable for expenses regardless of outcome." - You are in debt with them as soon as you sign their contract.
Criminal & DUI - Little or $0 Down* - Affordable Payment Plans - Proven Results**
*Little or $0 down available if requested for misdemeanor cases in San Diego County not set for trial on approved credit. **Case results vary. No prediction of outcome is possible.
NOTE THE HUSTLE: "Little or $0 down available if requested for misdemeanor cases in San Diego County not set for trial on approved credit" - Misdemeanor Only, so if your misdemeanor case changes to a felony case which is what Pacific Law Center aims for if you or your loved ones are wealthy they can charge you more or drop you, and if your case starts as a felony case and changes to a misdemeanor case, there is no refunds. Little $ Down is to trap you and your loved ones with credit card numbers.
Chicanery
Complaints: Kerry Steigerwalt's Pacific Law Center is a Fraud